Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Building chicken coops

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted by User:John Reaves Corpx (talk) 04:38, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Building chicken coops

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article had previously been prodded because it appeared to be a how-to guide. The page creator made some changes to the article and removed the prod tag to contest the proposed deletion, but this article still looks like a how-to guide. In addition, this article does not appear to explain how or why chicken coops are significant, nor does it attempt to provide a history of chicken coops. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 22:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also there is an article on Chicken coop. Dr.K. logos 23:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge into the chicken coop article as appropriate. Various methods of construction and architectural aspects, as appropriate, could be useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gosox5555 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep and Merge to chicken coop. The GFDL requires that the edit history be maintained when an article is merged, so you cannot delete an article if you intend to merge it. -- Eastmain (talk) 23:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Merge to chicken coop. As said by Gosox5555, " Various methods of construction and architectural aspects, as appropriate, could be useful." Airplaneman ^talk 23:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think we forgot something here. The whole article has no citations. It is pure OR. How can we import uncited info into another article? Even the picture is a copyvio from an educational website and it is uploaded to Commons. It should be deleted immediately. Dr.K. logos 00:30, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I guess the problem was solved for us. Could an admin kindly close this discussion? Thanks. Dr.K. logos 01:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.