Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullet Raja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:19, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bullet Raja

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film still in production with no release date so not notable per Wikipedia:Notability (films). Eeekster (talk) 00:53, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:NFF ●Mehran ^Debate● 08:20, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theo polisme 02:21, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Multiple notable sites and newspapers are covering it! --Tito Dutta (talk) 21:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Tito. Torreslfchero (talk) 07:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:NFF is not the nail in the coffin. It addresses "future films" and specifically instructs "films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines." As provided by User:Titodutta, we have the multiple reliable sources which give this film the requisite significant coverage. I think this should be considered as an allowable exception. Let issues be improved over time and through regular editing.Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:55, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.