Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C&A Industries
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 12:49, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- C&A Industries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Since this article has been speedily deleted seven times in under three weeks, I figure we should settle this article's status once and for all. For that reason I'm replacing the PROD nomination with this AfD nomination for "unremarkable company". —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:09, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Salt No notability, unremarkable company, no independent, non-trivial third party sources, not even a claim of notability in the article that would justify keeping. Make it go away, and keep it from coming back again. Theseeker4 (talk) 15:40, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt the advertisement. The only claim to notability in the article is that the company employs 450 people, and that ain't notable. Themfromspace (talk) 16:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete The reference to placement on Inc's 5000 Fastest Growing Private Companies seems significant, but it is 5 year old information. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt. A non-notable, non-consumer services business. Appearing on a list of 5,000 companies does not make a strong case for notability. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt — Lack of sources demonstrating any notability. Please enact creation protection and make the article's (apparently clueless after seven deletions) creator make a case with deletion review for recreation next time. MuZemike (talk) 17:58, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt: A company that doesn't pass WP:CORP. Schuym1 (talk) 18:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball delete and salt per above, no assertation of notability. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Salt This page has been deleted and re-created 7 times. As per everything mentioned above, can't we delete it and protect it from creation? And we should notify whoever is recreating this page.Cssiitcic (talk) 20:01, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Salt as per most everyone. Also recommend a Checkuser on the 3 different accounts that have been re-creating this article. Edward321 (talk) 02:02, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.