Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canlubang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 08:19, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Canlubang

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NGEO and WP:GNG. hueman1 (talk) 10:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 10:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:30, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article needs cleanup and references, but unless I'm mistaken? it seems to clearly pass both WP:NGEO and WP:GNG... SportingFlyer talk 12:42, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Obviously passes WP:NGEO. What is nom thinking? 192.160.216.52 (talk) 16:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- I hope you can refer to this discussion for a not so known geographical place that decided on Singkamas, Makati. -- Namayan (talk) 06:22, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:NGEO, just because an article needs clean up doesn't mean it should be deleted. JC7V-talk 17:00, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.