Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carpathian Wolves

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was merge to Graveland#Discography. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:10, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Carpathian Wolves

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

searched and cannot establish this as Wikipedia-notable - e.g. has not been covered in several publications from notable/reliable sources Lachlan Foley (talk) 04:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per WP:GNG. Potential RSs:[1][2], (SPSs:[3][4][5]). Otherwise, merge to Graveland, per WP:NALBUMS, because the current version of the article is little more than a track listing. There is some encyclopedic content to be gleaned from the reviews, which warrants inclusion. -- Trevj (talk) 10:11, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:15, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:18, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:06, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NMUSIC. Qworty (talk) 23:44, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to article on band. Lack of notability. I don't think SSMT Reviews is a reliable source, as it appears to be a one-man operation. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:42, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.