Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cesar Claro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:46, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cesar Claro

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail the biographies guidelines. Being a CEO or a committee member is not of itself notable. The sources available either mention Claro tangentially or only re-state his appointments or position rather than establishing his impact on the historical record. He is most often quoted when speaking on behalf on the SIEDC, making the articles about SIEDC rather than himself. Fæ (talk) 09:15, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 09:16, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 09:17, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable. Executive director of a redevelopment agency like tens of thousands of other redevelopment agencies. He "manages a staff of twelve, an operating budget of $1.7 million" - most small businesses are bigger than that. News hits are trivial or extremely local. --MelanieN (talk) 02:51, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:BASIC. Although there is one reliable source, the depth of the coverage is not substantial. "Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability," according to WP:BASIC. Guoguo12 --Talk-- 00:52, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable spam piece. Blatant promotion. Fails WP:BIO due to lack of significant coverage. Christopher Connor (talk) 00:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Completly fails WP:BIO. Maybe in 10-20 years time, but not now. scope_creep (talk) 22:50, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.