Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cisco ASA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:20, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cisco ASA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination. 50.84.181.6 added the AFD template and the following comment on the talk page: "Just a copy of spec sheet - Fundamentally unencyclopaedic, Notability not established, and no third party sources. Non-notable per WP:GNG." Keφr (talk) 16:57, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Considering the ASA replaced 3 extremely popular Cisco products, and is similarly popular itself, notability should not be a problem. Google News search shows 310 hits, not even archive search, just regular news search. Gigs (talk) 17:57, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:33, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete References found from Google search were not independent or detailed coverage. Most reviewed are advertisements or partner reprints of Cisco PR material and Cisco sponsored Certification books. See WP:VRS, WP:GNG, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:PRIMARY; maybe redirect to Cisco Systems. - LES 953 (talk) 11:57, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 08:20, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

""Keep"" The Cisco ASA range are by far the most popular security devices ever made. The article needs work but that is not a good reason to delete it. 86.139.246.38 (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is just a Cisco spec sheet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wemdann (talk • contribs) 13:38, 24 September 2012 (UTC) — Wemdann (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete - Notability not established. What makes this security product important enough for a WP article? - SpudMcCoy (talk) 13:43, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources. If in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources is added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:41, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.