Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collapse Into Now

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to R.E.M.#Accelerate: 2006–present. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 00:53, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Collapse Into Now

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:HAMMER and the previous AfD on (the correctly capitalized) Collapse into Now. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:21, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Way too soon for an article; wait until the album's received more in-depth coverage. I'm sure some fanboy just wet himself over being the first person to post this info on Wikipedia... Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 05:17, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to R.E.M.#Accelerate: 2006–present as there is not enough information for a decent (non-stub) article, but it is a valid search term. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 12:22, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:48, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to R.E.M.#Accelerate: 2006–present, as suggested by Armbrust above. The band article is where a near-future album should be discussed until an album article can stand on its own.--DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.