Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compelling Feature

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:34, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Compelling Feature

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination. Prod removed without explanation by article creator; original rationale was "Unreferenced and containing little or no useful information. Fails WP:VER and WP:OR" KuyaBriBri^Talk 05:31, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTHOWTO and WP:COATRACK. --SquidSK ^(1MC^•^log) 06:26, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems to be a WP:NEOLOGISM that is not notable as a term for the concept it seems to be trying to describe --Glenfarclas (talk) 09:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO and WP:COATRACK, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Creator has now removed AFD tag three times and is well on his way to getting blocked. MuffledThud (talk) 10:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research andy (talk) 13:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.