Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conoco Stadium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was redirect to Grimsby Town F.C.#Stadium. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:58, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conoco Stadium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:36, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plans have been cancelled and the club is looking at a new alternative site and if that is viable. The company 'Conoco' also no longer exsists as is now known as Philips66 RM-Taylor (talk) 11:10, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to an article in the local newspaper discussing residents objecting to a new stadium at a planned new site

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:31, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge & redirect to Blundell Park, the club's current stadium. Giant Snowman 12:33, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's nothing of significance to this proposal that merits its own article — the corresponding content in Grimsby Town and Blundell Park seems adequate.—A bit iffy (talk) 20:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The proposed new stadium has been cancelled. Blundell Park is reasonable. --Artene50 (talk) 02:53, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. A bit iffy (talk) 04:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Grimsby Town F.C.#Stadium. Unless the Club manages to get itself promoted back the the Football League, it seems unlikely that it will ever be able to afford to get the stadium built. The Club and Blundell Park articles need attention as they are both talking of 2010/11 as in the future. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:30, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.