Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmic energy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Energy (esotericism). czar 18:13, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmic energy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

{{{The content of this page was a disambig Cosmic energy (disambiguation) and then this page was created as an article, with just the content from the disambig moved here.... }}} TantraYum (talk) 07:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator agree with discussion below- didn't realize it had been a redirect already, let's just make it that. TantraYum (talk) 18:58, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This shouldn't be a redlink. Just revert it to the redirect to Energy (esotericism). —Cryptic 07:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 April 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Cryptic. SpinningSpark 00:58, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect (per above) Cosmic energy to Energy (esotericism) as primary topic. The conversion of Cosmic energy from a redirect to a dab page may have been because there is no redirect/other uses hatnote at Energy (esotericism): I fixed that. ~~What does need attention is the content of Cosmic energy (disambiguation), but that's another story~~ Good job user:Spinningspark. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:30, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. There was a hatnote, up until it removed - in the edit immediately preceding yours - by the same IP who cut-and-paste-moved the dab. —Cryptic 08:57, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cryptic: You're right, there was, in which case I can't explain th IP editor's actions! Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:47, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.