Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CppDepend

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CppDepend

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any coverage in secondary reliable sources and thus fails the notability guidelines. Also, article was created by possible WP:COI User:Issam lahlali who appears to also be the creator of the software: [1]. Odie5533 (talk) 05:58, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Obviously, no home should be without a static analysis tool for C++ developers that provides 82 code metrics, several real-time code visualization panels, code base snapshots comparison, architectural and quality rules (edition and real-time validation). Any coverage such a thing gets is going to be of "limited interest and circulation", so this can never be really notable. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.