Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative FM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. Well I'm closing this myself - I had hoped someone would close it for me but doesn't look like that's gonna happen so screw it - Sources have been provided which I'm happy with so I'm wrapping this up. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 05:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creative FM

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable radio station, Created in 2006 & been unsourced ever since, The creator was "BSS" which I'm assuming is "Beaumont Street Studios", Anyway no evidence of notability - Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 02:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:33, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - appears to be a temporary station which operated under a restrictive license from OFCOM. It does not appear to have applied, or been granted, a license for some years and the linked website is broken. JMWt (talk) 09:06, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The company running the studio was indeed Beaumont Street Studios Ltd (Company number 2189926) as bssonair.co.uk, which was dissolved December 2013, although they ran the station as creativefm.net from 2007, a site now defunct and available, if it ever became the site for the station. There never seems to have been any references for this station, notable or not, so an assumption of not notable and a delete would be appropriate. Acabashi (talk) 03:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename to Beaumont Street Studios per the significant coverage in reliable sources.
This article can be reworked to be part of an article about Beaumont Street Studios, which has received significant coverage in the BBC, a 2006 book published by Rowman & Littlefield, and Huddersfield Daily Examiner. Information about Creative FM can also be sourced from the BBC and Huddersfield Daily Examiner.
1. Rennie, Ellie (2006). Community Media: A Global Introduction. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 150. ISBN 0742574466. Retrieved 2015-11-19.
  The book notes:
  
  Beaumont Street Studios
  The neighborhood development approach to community broadcasting can be seen in Huddersfield, a small town in West Yorkshire. Beaumont Street Studios, established in 1985, was initially a response to social problems within the local black community. In its early days, the center offered only sound recording studios and training, but it has now diversified into multimedia, as well as radio and video training and production. Beaumont Street Studios runs short-term radio broacasts—called Creative FM—under the Restricted Service License scheme. The studio is also involved in the New Deal for Musicians and the New Deal for Creative Industries, both New Labour strategies to bring unemployed people back into the labor market...
  ...
  Beaumont Street Studios have no core funding and their annual income varies from year to year depending on what funding is available. According to [training manager Jeni] Vine, in the year 1999/2000, the annual income was around half a million pounds. ... The commercial operations include sound studio rental and short-courses for businesses. But the majority of funding comes from grant-based projects, including the New Deal for Musicians.
2. Davison, Emma (2010-02-08). "Mystery surrounds Huddersfield's Beaumont Street Studios closure". Huddersfield Daily Examiner. Archived from the original on 2015-11-19. Retrieved 2015-11-19.
3. "Places features: Beaumont Street Studios, Huddersfield". BBC. 2006-10-18. Archived from the original on 2015-11-19. Retrieved 2015-11-19.
  The article notes:
  
  What do Huddersfield's Town Crier and Embrace, of World Cup song fame, have in common? Well, they are just some of the people who have had doors opened for them by the town's Beaumont Street Studios which is celebrating its 21st birthday!
  Beaumont Street Studios (BSS) may now be Yorkshire's answer to London's Abbey Road but it began in a very small way. It was set up in 1985 by the Huddersfield West Indian Association. ...
4. "Tuning in to Creative radio". Huddersfield Daily Examiner. 2004-06-17. Archived from the original on 2015-11-19. Retrieved 2015-11-19.
5. "What next for Beaumont Street Studios after assets sale?". Huddersfield Daily Examiner. 2010-10-05. Archived from the original on 2015-11-19. Retrieved 2015-11-19.
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Beaumont Street Studios to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 07:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nom Comment - Unfortunately I can't withdraw so could I ask an admin to wrap this up & move the article please? - Sources are fine & I'll add 'em later so no point in this being left open, (BTW thanks Cunard for the sources). –Davey2010^Talk 07:38, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.