Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyarika
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 04:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Cyarika (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD - Wikipedia is not a dictionary WP:NOTDIC -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:06, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. --Gian (talk) 11:36, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete dictionary definition and an unverified one at that. If someone can find an instance where this word is actually used it might be possible to trankswiki part of it to Wiktionary. Hut 8.5 12:03, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. & Hut --Silent Bob (talk) 12:06, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Armbrust Talk Contribs 14:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unsourced dicdef. --Kinu t/c 17:25, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.