Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cypress Grove (musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten (talk) 10:25, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cypress Grove (musician)

Delete substub BLP sourced to myspace that is a one-liner filled with weasel words and peacock prose. Our BLP's have to be better than this, and since notability isn't inherited "worked with" connotes barely a claim to notability. If I worked with someone notable - like as a graduate student with a professor, do I get an article too? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails general notability and WP:artist Niteshift36 (talk) 00:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I found no evidence that notability guidelines have been met. Dawn Bard (talk) 00:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I can find a few hits on Google to support the assertion that this artist worked with Jeffrey Lee Pierce (an article which is also entirely unsourced); but absolutely nothing to demonstrate any independent notability. A BLP with no available reliable sources and virtually no encylopedic content - we really shouldn't keep this kind of thing around. ~ mazca ^t|c 17:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, how is this person possibly notable? Myspace really isn't a reliable source. Nyttend (talk) 18:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.