Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyrus Poncha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor 19:22, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrus Poncha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG! Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions! ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 17:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions! ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 17:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep 2016 Asian Squash coach of the year [1] for starters, long time national team coach. "Architect of India's squash empire" {https://parsikhabar.net/sports/cyrus-poncha-the-architect-of-indias-squash-empire/17430/}. There are many nmmore. There is no reasonable way to assume the nominator bothered with before and found Poncha to fail gng. This nomination is disruptive! Jacona (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The second source you provided is not a reliable source. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Because you don't like it? Smartyllama (talk) 12:40, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Where do I start with this outrageous nomination? Many, many sources available. [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], and undoubtedly many more non-English ones. Clearly an absurd nomination, and this is far from the first such nomination by this user. Smartyllama (talk) 12:39, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Found plenty of sources and added in the article. Meets WP:GNG. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:29, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.