Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D'ni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, or at the very least, no consensus. -- RG ² 02:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

D'ni

in-universe article with no references, and no relation to the real world. Ridernyc 16:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep huge following but needs secondary, verifiable sources that are easily available with a "D'ni" search in Google. Once sources are added, I'd keep the article due to the broad scope. --Blind Eagle^{talk~contribs} 16:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. They're a major part of the Myst universe. This article needs a lot of work, though, as much of it is too in-universe and lacking references. Pinball22 16:58, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete all, or delete all but D'ni and merge the others there if needed for defensive reaons (to keep the cruft from leaking back in to WP). JJL 17:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep with the other articles below merged into it & sourced correctly (and re-worded as out-of-universe where needed). As Eagle said, there appear to be quite a few out there. SkierRMH 00:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Since most of the other D'ni articles are too large to merge and are likely to be deleted, this one is likely to improve. Since Myst is a popular franchise, and D'ni is (are?) part of that franchise, this one can and should stay. Advice-- edit heavily, include lots of links. Mandsford 00:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki (if that is the right word) to a dedicated D'ni pedia. Allow, perhaps, 7 days for the dedicated fans to do this; then delete all, retaining only a redirect to Myst, where there can be a cross-link to the (presumptive) dedicated Wiki. Otherwise delete all as fictives. -- Simon Cursitor 07:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you have SEVEN DAYS to get "D'ni pedia" up and running. Don't complain. God created the universe in less time than that. Mandsford 11:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

how long dose it take to cut an paste code into a new wiki. Also as per other deletions you can always ask an admin for the page contents. Ridernyc 13:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

in fact there is already a myst wiki that needs much of this information. http://dni.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page Ridernyc 13:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the main article, just as we have Sindar; merge D'ni numerals, which would be difficult to condense, and contains an out-of-universe note; summarize the rest, and merge the summaries. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 23:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins 14:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as article has no primary sources, nor reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability. Most of the article is written from an in-universe perspective and primarily comprises of plot summary. There are no sober agruments for keeping this fancruft. --Gavin Collins 14:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.