Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DE-CIX New York

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 18:50, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DE-CIX New York

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Copied and pasted to mainspace from a pending AfC submission, this article is sourced to two press releases and the organization itself, I don't see sources which meet WP:CORPDEPTH, and as a result, I don't believe this topic meets our notability criteria. j⚛e decker ^talk 21:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added a paragraph and two additional sources regarding the peering problem in the US and the European Internet exchange model in comparison to the North American model. Please check.User talk:Frankfurt1995 11:20, 4 June 2014 (CEST)

I think the Capacity magazine addition was good (thank you!), the GigaOm article only mentions the topic in relationship to the fellow providing quotes. Which is certainly some connection, but not enough to serve as the primary reliable source from which the article should be written. It's not for me to decide, but I'm afraid I still think this is, so far, a little below our usual notability bar. --j⚛e decker ^talk 01:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.