Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Arnett
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:00, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dan Arnett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not pass WP:POLITICIAN. 黒い白い (KuroiShiroi) 14:59, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. --Bobak (talk) 17:29, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. "Candidates to be candidates" need have something else interesting about them to be notable. Hairhorn (talk) 19:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:55, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Hairhorn and nom, no objections to speedy close. GlassCobra 15:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.