Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DataObjects.Net

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 May 19.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DataObjects.Net

This 'development framework' was initially released 85 days ago. The article does not demonstrate that the development framework is notable, and does not give sources for its assertion that the product is different from its competition. The framework is at least partly a profit-making enterprise, meaning that this article functions partly as an advertisement. Richard Cavell (talk) 15:03, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. "It really differs from any other ORM tool at this time..." That doesn't sound very encyclopedic. Next to no information, 'differing from other ORM' claim unreferenced. TopGearFreak 15:34, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (A1/A7/G11) — lack of context, lack of notability, processed Hormel meat, take your pick. MuZemike (talk) 01:47, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete badly written article about a non-notable late entry into the already-crowded field of ORM tools. I see no reason to keep this article. JulesH (talk) 00:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per others. There is no indication that this article will meet WP:CORP. Dekisugi (talk) 10:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.