Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Musil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — Cirt (talk) 14:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- David Musil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of article has not attained notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY or WP:GNG. Drafted by KHL in 1st round does not qualify. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 18:55, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Has adequate coverage to meet WP:GNG, e.g., [1], [2]. Even if he does not, his father's article has sourced information related to him, and so this should be redirected there. Rlendog (talk) 19:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nomination. --Ozgod (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - He passes WP:GNG as demonstrated by the significant coverage he has received in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, including:
- The Hockey News feature article
- Dan Swallow's feature profile
- The Edmonton Journal feature article
- Globe and Mail feature article
- The Province feature article
The published feature stories (non-routine coverage) about this player pushes this article over the GNG threshold required for a stand-alone article. Dolovis (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Looks like there is enough coverage to indicate that he meets the GNG. Qrsdogg (talk) 19:19, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.