Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Development Business
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗plicit 23:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Development Business (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Only non-WP:IS sources. Fails wP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:44, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - Article probably needs to be re-written, it's so out-of-date, and needs independent sourcing. However, the home page of United Nations Development Business is evidence that this is a vital part of the United Nations. Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations doesn't look like it's too active these days. The article is legit and notable. — Maile (talk) 01:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:46, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.