Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogs Life Info

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:27, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dogs Life Info

Wikipedia is not a compendium of miscellaneous facts. If this information is useful, it should be in the Dogs Life article. —Bkell (talk) 14:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Mayalld (talk) 14:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'd have suggested Merge but I'm not sure there's anything there worth merging; it's game-guide info and unsubstantiated. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 15:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom YoungWebProgrammer ^msg 16:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not a game guide. JIP | Talk 18:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All the noteworthy content here already exists in Dogs Life - all that's lacking are the details, and those those are utterly trivial. Zetawoof_(ζ) 09:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another 20:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've copied this info over to subpages of StrategyWiki:Dog's Life and added a link on the Dog's Life page. -- Prod (Talk) 02:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it's game guide material. I would have recommended a merge, but there's no gameplay or development stuff that can be transplanted into the main article. I'd also have suggested Transwiki, but Prod has taken care of that. Gazimoff (talk) 15:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.