Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dual control stand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Glossary of rail transport terms. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dual control stand

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject simply isn't sufficiently notable to justify its own page. The only references here simply support that the locomotives of XYZ company had dual control stands. There's not even a hint of notability. A before search finds results exclusively in locomotive manuals, which are primary sources and do not establish notability. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could this content not be merged somewhere as an alternative to deletion? NemesisAT (talk) 02:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you can find a valid merge topic, a redirect might be in order. But there's nothing sourced to merge. I looked quickly for logical merge targets and couldn't find any. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glossary of rail transport terms.. Djflem (talk) 15:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Stkngjo (talk) 04:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Glossary of rail transport terms as ATD and useful addition to that glossary.Djflem (talk) 15:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would not be opposed to merging this to Glossary of rail transport terms. We just need a better source. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:39, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.