Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ETTN
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- ETTN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged as unsourced since 2011. Not even sure if this is a thing in the first place - just a whole lot of wiki mirrors and so on coming up in google, or unrelated things with the same acronym. asilvering (talk) 08:58, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment appears to be something that hasnt taken off, created by Magnanimitas Association that doesn't have an article here or on Czchek WP, DOI used instead? Coolabahapple (talk) 08:03, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.