Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elephant Army

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 01:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Elephant Army

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable topic - no indication it has been covered by multiple reliable sources; therefore fails WP:N. Lack of notability together with the wording of the title makes it unsuitable for retaining a redirect. C 679 17:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. C 679 17:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C 679 17:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 11. Snotbot t • c » 17:51, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 11. Snotbot t • c » 22:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:ORG. Run-of-the-mill fan club about which nothing encyclopedic can be said. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 06:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 09:49, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Govvy (talk) 14:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - has not been subject of significant coverage, and fails WP:GNG. Mentoz86 (talk) 10:44, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet WP:N and relies entirely on self-published or primary sources.—Baldy Bill (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.