Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fun-Nazi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was most likely delete. This article was speedy deleted as offensive, trollish nonsense. --MarkSweep (call me collect) 08:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per WP:WINAD, as a slang term with growing use it may belong in a dictionary, but not an encyclopedia. Beyond definition, content is speculative and frivilous. Rockpocket 07:09, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dont Delete If you delete it, doesnt that make you a Fun-Nazi? Bill the Bear 07:09, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Belongs in Urban Dictionary. Ramanpotential 07:10, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing is frivilous. If it belongs in a dictionary, then with this amount of information, it belongs in an encyclopaedia too.
Delete. Beyond the definition, content is highly speculative at best. --Chris 07:17, 23 March 2006 (UTC) (Please don't edit my signature, thanks.)[reply]
DO NOT DELETE. You all must realize that by deleting this article you have simply provided reference for it. By deleting it you are all Fun-Nazis. If you delete it you will only enhance its credibility. Please rethink your decisions. --Rakamamakmak 07:20, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- On the other hand, by keeping the article, fun-nazism will become even less notable. We wouldn't want that to happen, would we? Delete. David Sneek 08:00, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I say keep it, it seems like a good article to me. It is a slang term, but i think it requires a bit more information that urbandictionary 24.16.148.14 07:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Editors 24.16.148.14, Rakamamakmak and Bill the Bear all appear to have limited and highly overlapping contribution profiles. Rockpocket 07:57, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dont DeleteI dont know about you, but the word "Fun Nazi" is taking on a life of its own in my area. Everyone on campus is saying it! I think as the stories come in, this will be a good article. I say give it a chance. The madscientist 07:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NO delete I agree with keeping it, most urban dictionaries don't provide nearly the amount of reference that this article does.
Dont delete This is a good, informitive article about the meaning behind the word that many of us hear but dont know what to think of it. --Compman11 07:30, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
please do not delete I saw this come up and I really like it. I think it fits the criteria very well for an encyclopedia article. its more than speculative --Crazycrazycrazy 07:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Compman11 and Crazycrazycrazy seem to be sock puppets -- check their contributions. —This unsigned comment was added by Crazycomputers (talk • contribs) ..
- Delete per nom and WP:NEO. --TeaDrinker 07:38, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(WP:SOCK)--Jimbo Wales has said, "It's generally considered uncool unless you have a good reason."-I consider the spread on info on Fun-Nazism a very very good reason —This unsigned comment was added by 71.112.39.164 (talk • contribs) .
- Speedy delete. Dictdef, magnet for vandalism and pretty much patent nonsense. GeorgeStepanek\talk
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.