Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaur City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gaur City

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced stub about a non-notable planned development, fails WP:N with flying colours. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating the following pages as part of the bundle, because they relate to the same development. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Non notableKashmorwiki (talk) 18:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: all of these articles. Main does not have SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth, others are nn content forks of the main. None of these meets NBUILD for historic, social, economic, or architectural importance. // Timothy :: talk 18:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 18:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a property website. This should have been CSD. RationalPuff (talk) 18:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, only: under what criterion? I did consider WP:G11, but concluded that didn't quite fit. You have other/better ideas? Cheers, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A7 and G11 both fits from my point of view. RationalPuff (talk) 20:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per above. Pilean (talk) 21:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all 3. Meet neither WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all if these ever get built, they might be notable then, but they are not notable as proposed projects that do not exist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:43, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.