Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gonga (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 00:54, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gonga (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No source has been provided since the creation of the article. It fails to fulfil the notability guideline for music. Myxomatosis75 (talk) 20:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Slightly weak keep. It's not a great article but there's coverage at both CLASH ([1], [2]) and Allmusic ([3], [4]). I couldn't find much else though. --Michig (talk) 21:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:09, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. A PopMatters review [5] and a shorter one at Uncut [6]...combined with Michig's findings, that might just be enough. Gongshow ^Talk 07:58, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Cleaned it up, threw in references. Looks notable enough. A412 (Talk • C) 04:04, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.