Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gothitech
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism, non-encyclopedic. One Google hit, presumably by author Docether 18:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per nom--Nick Y. 19:27, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:NEO. Sandstein 19:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. No assertion of notability, no sources, nothing but nonsense. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 19:33, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Fails WP:MUSIC. (15,000 songs!) Dominick (TALK) 19:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Neologism. Complete nonsense. Beno1000 21:46, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - advertisement disguised as a genre. Ac@osr 22:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete this is getting a bit ridiculous, the same user is responisble for similar neologism attempts "post goth", "Space Industrial" and "urban goth". - Deathrocker 11:33, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone above, but especially User:Deathrocker. Joyous! | Talk 23:09, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable, non-verifiable.--Adrift* 12:23, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.