Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gravitational induction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gravitational induction

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A novel physics concept, coined by the author of the article, citing his own self-published papers. It references other deleted topics created by the same author, such as strong gravitational constant and Lorentz-invariant theory of gravitation. Most of the significant statements in the article reference a paper found only on the author's personal website (ref 2.) – SJ + 11:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC) – SJ + 11:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominator, at best leaving a single footnote in gravitomagnetism. – SJ + 11:49, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As Betsythedevine noted on the talk page: "this article seems to have many of the same problems noted at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Strong_gravitational_constant_(2nd_nomination). That is, it seems to be expounding the content of some physics research papers written by the person who wrote this article, a conflict of interest problem. If there are respectably published secondary sources that discuss the ideas of Fedosin in this area, then those sources should be cited here -- if not, the topic fails WP:NOTABILITY."

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as poorly written OR. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:33, 7 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete for the reasons suggested by the nominator. --Steve (talk) 01:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.