Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greece EURO 2004 triumph

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:31, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greece EURO 2004 triumph

Topic is already covered at the main Euro 2004 page, this article is unneccessary. Simon KHFC 18:53, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, SqueakBox 19:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Simon KHFC 19:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, Peanut4 19:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this article is essentially a combination of the Euro 2004 section on Greece national football team and UEFA Euro 2004 and it should stay that way. Peanut4 20:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - don't you mean each article should stay separate? Your statement could be construed as supportive of the nominated article, instead of supporting your own Delete vote! Ref ^(chew)(do) 22:29, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - it was merely an additional comment that even if I supported the entry, it includes nothing new anyway. I realise a lot of articles start by pasting other sections, but this entry has nothing at all new. And I support deletion because it's unneccessary and unencycoplaedic. Peanut4 22:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - celebrationist, even triumphalist, article which adds nothing to the information already found in the Euro 2004 article (in fact it blatantly plagiarises the main article). The whole exercise is non-NPOV, as it covers only one perspective, that of the Greek team. Ref ^(chew)(do) 20:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Euro 2004. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jelly the Supermodel (talk • contribs) 20:29, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - why merge something which is admittedly already covered in the main article (as nominated)? Ref ^(chew)(do) 22:29, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as fork/copy & paste of other articles, POV title. Would not be acceptable as redirect, pointless merging. Qwghlm 22:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 08:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, pointless duplication. Robotforaday 17:37, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.