Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gutteruncensored
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Icewedge (talk) 06:44, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Gutteruncensored (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable blog. References either nowhere mention "Gutteruncensored", or are links to the blog and its Facebook page. Delete. (Previously speedily deleted by me.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:35, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 20:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Speedied three times or something like that, two of which were successful. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 00:18, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Non-notable blog with references that are not always reliable. Airplaneman talk 20:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. Any chance of protecting this from being recreated? --Odie5533 (talk) 15:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt. Per the above. Utterly nonnotable. Tim Song (talk) 04:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.