Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halvsie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halvsie

Seems to be WP:Neologism invented by Halvsie.com. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 05:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Only usages in print are trivial mentions of the website URL, not even actual uses of the term [1][2]; barely any web GHits except directly related to the website's author: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL). No evidence is given to show that anyone on the alleged "list of halvsies" actually self-identifies using this term. cab 06:45, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not only do many of the people here not refer to themselves as 'halvsies', many could potentially take offense to the term or contest it's accuracy, a BLP issue. Keeper | 76 17:03, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The article looks like original research.--Gavin Collins 20:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Possibly notable, but it needs some real references. for one thing, it is not clear to me to what extent this may be considered a derogatory term. DGG (talk) 05:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I doubt it's intended to be derogatory as it looks like the inventor of the term made it up to apply to herself. On the other hand, I don't see how it's even possibly notable when it doesn't get used by anyone aside from the person who made it up. cab 06:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, there is no such thing as Halvsie, it is definitely something that the website made up. --Kudret abi^Talk 06:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.