Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holocarpha Imbecilus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was

Holocarpha Imbecilus

I've read it, it's not even BJAODN material. DS 12:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense, delete. Lupo 11:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, so tagged, patent nonsense (look at the image the author has uploaded). NawlinWiki 11:52, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Obvious and notable scientific value for Wikipedia, probably a bad-faith AFD nomination. 71.101.136.70 12:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note can't be that valuable -- author has now blanked it, I've added db-author tag. NawlinWiki 12:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.