Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Home Movie (2008 Film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per obvious consensus. (WP:NAC) flaming lawye r^c 17:48, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Home Movie (2008 Film)

non-notable film Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 20:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Doesn't show notability per WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 21:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Vote changed to keep: Passes WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 13:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:15, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
STRONG Keep With respects to the nom, per WP:ATD I have found enough to both properly assert and show notability of this film and will do so over the next couple hours. Give me a little time and the article will shine. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- NOTE: I have just completed cleanup, expansion, and sourcing. Its a keeper. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think MQS is on to something. The film's notability appears to be confirmed. The article could benefit from editing, not erasure. Ecoleetage (talk) 04:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It should be titled Home Movie (2008 film) and not Home Movie (2008 Film). I'm not sure if you're allowed to move a page while it's at AFD. Lugnuts (talk) 09:04, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That can sometimes cause a problem. I had planned myself to make just that move per the naming conventions if the article survived this AfD. Good eyes. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 09:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! And Keep based on the references added. Lugnuts (talk) 10:08, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well done on the article. Vote changed to Keep, let's have an admin go ahead and close this one. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 15:38, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.