Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMAF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. Beeblebrox (talk) 08:55, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IMAF

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable marial art organisation without sources to back up notabilty Dwanyewest (talk) 19:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

comment Have you considered notifying User:JJL that you have started an AFD on an article he created? He could have references. jmcw (talk) 10:09, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Dwanyewest The original author JJL is a reputable author in the Wikipeida MA group and appears to be in a wiki pause. 1) Could this AFD be deferred until he responses to this lack of source/notability issues? 2) If not, could the closing admin please move the article to JJL's name space? Thank you both! jmcw (talk) 13:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Merge into Remy Presas, may need some additional sourcing, but this is definitely a notable organization.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 17:50, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is an unsourced article, so it clearly fails WP:V. User JJL seems to have a good library, so I'm willing to give him a chance to source this article. Astudent0 (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Remy Presas Splintered organization with no independent sources. I think merging it into the founder's article is a reasonable compromise. Papaursa (talk) 02:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Remy Presas seems reasonable to me. Astudent0 (talk) 17:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Remy Presas per above.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 18:02, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.