Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Identity 3.0

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The weight of WP:PAG based argument comes down in favor of deletion. And while I am not discounting the two comments from editors with potential COI issues, their responses were unpersuasive. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Identity 3.0

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable buzzword that hasn't been the subject of significant coverage; the independent references are only tied to the topic through WP:SYNTH. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:22, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note sure if this is how you comment: but here goes;

I'm at a loss to understand how this is flagged for deletion; yes this entry is based on original research, however the term / research comes from;

* Phillip Hallam-Baker
* Tim Mather
* The Open Group 
* Jericho Forum
* Cloud Security Alliance
* the Global Identity Foundation

As a Security and Identity expert, who has been in this field for a LONG time (see: https://www.networkworld.com/article/2316916/infrastructure-management/the-50-most-powerful-people-in-networking.html?page=6#simmonds) this IS a term in common use - in fact Identity is currently one of the hottest topics in Information Security - and this Wiki page is referenced in numerous industry presentations.

If Wikipedia wants to be the pre-eminent source of information then it is critical that articles such as this are included! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simmondp (talk • contribs) 07:50, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just added the "Other Coverage" section to show the term in widespread and diverse (but contextual) usage within the industry globally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simmondp (talk • contribs) 09:54, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:58, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 14:53, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also a previously undisclosed WP:COI for this article and for Jericho Forum, apparently. Bakazaka (talk) 15:17, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Violates WP:PROMO as an advocacy piece. The article states a "need to move [...] to Identity 3.0" and "need for a paradigm shift." The entire Principles of Identity 3.0 section reproduces a presentation written by the article creator (Simmondp / Paul Simmonds), which would be a copyright violation if it were written by any other user. — Newslinger talk 14:27, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Added WP:COI notices to Identity 3.0, Talk:Identity 3.0, Talk:Jericho Forum, and User talk:Simmondp. — Newslinger talk 14:35, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 20:52, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 20:52, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.