Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indigeridoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Content can be recovered from history and merged, if it is deemed appropriate. GDonato (talk) 16:20, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indigeridoo

Non-notable fictional play with very little content other than song lyrics whose inclusion must be dubious on copyright grounds. The remaining content is already in We Can Be Heroes: Finding The Australian of the Year Mattinbgn\^talk 22:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 22:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to We Can Be Heroes: Finding The Australian of the Year. There are some articles referencing this but not outside the context of the series. [1] Capitalistroadster 01:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. JJL 02:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails Notability. Twenty Years 10:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to We Can Be Heroes: Finding The Australian of the Year as non-notable. •97198 talk 12:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no secondary sources to establish notability. Doctorfluffy 04:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to We Can Be Heroes: Finding The Australian of the Year. No reason for deletion of content and it is well developed - it just doesn't warrant a separate article. Auroranorth (sign) 10:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.