Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Milburn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Milburn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I started cleaning up this article, but it looks more and more as if this artist lacks all notability. His art movement Omni art (a long article before I redirected it here) has received no attention as far as I can tell. The references to the village voice are an ad Milburn posted in that publication, not an article about him. The article is not a hoax or anything, Milburn has self-published a book and has a regular podcast, and has received some attention from fringe websites, but it seems that no reliable sources (books, newspapers, art magazines) have as yet given him much attention. Fram (talk) 09:46, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:54, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:55, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this (and Omni art, whcih is redirected here). This is a masterful piece of promotion, given that nothing beyond the most minuscule passing mentions are available in RS. There might be a tiny smidgen more in sources for Omni art, but I very much doubt it. GNG fail for both this article and Omni art. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 20:10, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I couldn't find any RS to support GNG. --Theredproject (talk) 05:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.