Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremiah Lexer
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:14, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Jeremiah Lexer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable subject for whom no reliable sources can be found. Article created by SPA. The references listed are two nonspecific websites and what appear to be promotional websites/blogs for a "haunt" attraction. PROD deleted by SPA. Geoff Who, me? 14:39, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. May even be a hoax. Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Hoax. I don't have a reliable source to make this official (not that the article has a reliable source to begin with), but postings by local residents confirm that the story is manufactured as marketing for area haunted house activities. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as a hoax. Cavarrone 06:48, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.