Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knicks Celtics FIght

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was merge to Celtics–Knicks rivalry. L Faraone 02:32, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Knicks Celtics FIght

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Signs point to this being a copy-and-paste recreation (mostly: full of wikimarkup on first edit [by new user!] and mentioning January 10th in the future), but I can't seem to find solid evidence of that. Anyway, I don't think we need six hundred words on one altercation at a sports game. Ignatz mice•talk 04:14, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the user's sandbox might prove me wrong about the re-creation, but I still don't think the fight is notable. Ignatz mice•talk 04:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~Merge/Redirect - unlike the other "brawl" articles linked to, I see no shred of notability here. See WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NNEWS (surprisingly, different articles!) for more details. Ansh666 07:07, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Celtics–Knicks rivalry. WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE not sufficient for a standalone article.—Bagumba (talk) 19:26, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Celtics–Knicks rivalry. And that was trash-talking, not a brawl. So definitely not notable enough to have an article.—Chris!_c/t 23:59, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.