Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lazerblast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lazerblast

Declined A7, but still fails WP:N. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article was already deleted once, recreated by a different user (though with a striking resemblance to the original article, usernames are very similar too). Was deemed to be blatent advertisement/promotion instead of an encyclopedic entry. The new article is heading the same direction, and using much of the same copy as the old one. There is very little information in this article, or that could be written into the article, that hasn't already been stated at Darien Lake and List of attractions at Darien Lake. →ClarkCT^Talk @ 15:24, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it fails WP:N and WP:ADVERT. —Cyclonenim^T@lk? 16:26, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per above. This is a light show at an amusement park ... although we already have a whopping WP:UNDUE involving this park, which doesn't merely have its own article, but a List of attractions at Darien Lake, a number of which have their own articles. No doubt there's an editor or three who think that this park is the greatest place ever, but not even its own website goes into that much detail. RGTraynor 23:59, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, not notable, spam. Sswonk (talk) 13:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.