Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightshot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:46, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lightshot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1. no notable software 2. Notability not established 3. WP is not advert/howto 4. like to see reasoning behind objecting to PROD Widefox (talk) 09:51, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per Widefox. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 09:57, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete — If it wasn't toned as an advert, I'd be a bit more inclusionist. If notability is established in the future, I would not object to the article's recreation. C_(u)w_(t)C_(c) 10:43, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 10:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no 3rd party references, no indication of notability for this software, created by an SPA as likely spam/promotional.Dialectric (talk) 13:36, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.