Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost Kings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Magnolia677 (talk) 00:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lost Kings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. Appear to have two songs that have charted on an emerging artist chart. Almost no secondary sources to support notability. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 21:29, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Doesn't fail any of those criteria the nominator mentioned. The musician has some charted songs [1] on Billboard Dance/Electronic chart (which is an acceptable chart per WP:BILLBOARDCHARTS) and reliable sources [2][3]. - TheMagnificentist 11:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep although, from what I can gather, this really should be kept to stub level. A full article is too much. Kellymoat (talk) 12:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep two charted singles and notable collaborations. Agree with Kelly that it should be kept at stub level at the moment. Karst (talk) 13:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.