Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luminox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mondaine. Mr.Z-man 01:01, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Luminox

Does not meet notability guidlines, Has been non-notable tagged since June 2007. The article is written like an advertisment an thats a little bit of a side reason to delete but Speedy g-11 was declined. The Rolling Camel (talk) 11:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC) The Rolling Camel (talk) 11:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - don't try to de-spam it, because the text is irretrievably tainted. - Richard Cavell (talk) 11:36, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect - and of course clean-up, it is spammy, to, Mondaine as these two companies are now one and the same, as shown here [1]. Thanks ShoesssS ^Talk 12:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect with a very short (2-3 sentences?), as indicated above, to Mondaine. --Stormbay (talk) 17:54, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect, no inline cites in the text so a merge seems pointless. Wizardman 23:00, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.