Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximum Male Models

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to LA Knight. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:35, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maximum Male Models

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been in the NPP queue for months. Various reviewers have tagged it or redirected it but these moves have been objected to. The subject doesn’t look notable to me but I generally avoid sports topics. I’m just tired of seeing it in the queue so bringing here for consensus. Mccapra (talk) 06:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wrestling and United States of America. Mccapra (talk) 06:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:59, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - GNG is passed with WP:SIGCOV in WP:PW/RS-approved sources Figure Four Online and Super Luchas. [1] [2] - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" ^{(work / talk)} 23:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain - Can't decide if the article passes GNG or not. Sure they've gained coverage, but I'm still not sure if they're notable enough to be an article. Hansen Sebastian^Talk 13:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - jobber tag team that hasnt achieved anything.Muur (talk) 07:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete They received some coverage but I'm not convinced it's substantial. Since they're a tag team, everything is already covered in the individual articles.LM2000 (talk) 14:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:50, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Might as well Redirect to LA Knight or Keep per GhostOfDanGurney. But I'm leaning towards Redirect for now. Hansen Sebastian^Talk 16:18, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with a redirect to LA Knight if consensus is to delete the article. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" ^{(work / talk)} 05:12, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.