Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikhaela Reid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 18:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mikhaela Reid

Fails WP:BIO, however probably doesn't meet criteria for a WP:CSD#A7. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 16:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It doesn't meet CSD A7, but it doesn't pass the notability guidelines. The source given doesn't seem to indicate notability. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 16:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It was already attempted to be deleted, but it was declined by W.marsh. The person contains claims of importance (published by notable papers and magazines) and was also interviewed by many notable organizations, including NPR (see external links in the main article). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cartoon-Fan (talk • contribs) 16:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom, fails WP:BIO. Media coverage (at least as represented in the article) is minimal at best; note the NPR piece is about an exhibit of Bush cartoons, not a feature on Reid. Precious Roy (talk) 20:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, with reservations. Sounds like an interesting individual who might be notable in the near future. For now, though, WP:BIO is not satisfied. Truthanado (talk) 01:58, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep: Two interviews in reliable sources, plus the cite from PrideSource referenced in the article satisfies WP:N. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 03:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Interviews in major news sources indicate sufficient notability. User:Dorftrottel 13:51, January 29, 2008
Keep per SatyrTN and Dorftrottel. Aleta (Sing) 23:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.