Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Aura International
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. While the keep argument provided additional references, two of them are interviews with this year's winner, the third being about her win. It failed to address the other participants concerns, particularly Robert McClenon's assessment that such references fail to provide significant coverage of the pageant itself. ✗plicit 10:35, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Miss Aura International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable beauty pageant Aloolkaparatha (talk) 15:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Aloolkaparatha (talk) 15:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:42, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable beauty pageant. See assessment of references.
| Number | Reference | Remarks | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not a reliable source | No | No | No | ||
| 2 | CONAN Daily | List of 2021 contestants | No, a press release | No | No [Bri] | |
| 3 | Manila Bulletin | Story about a Filipina contestant | No |
This page was created in both draft space and article space, probably in order to game the system. This prevents draftification, but it doesn't prevent deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:10, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Just a quick question to @Robert McClenon: How is the Manila Bulletin source not independent? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- User:HueMan1 - Assessment changed; conclusion left unchanged. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Just a quick question to @Robert McClenon: How is the Manila Bulletin source not independent? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The event was covered by Manila Bulletin[1], ABS-CBN Corporation[2], Habertürk[3], I think meets WP:GNG.Brayan ocaner (talk) 23:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable beauty pageant. It failed to meet the notability guidelines.---Richie Campbell (talk) 01:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:28, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:28, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. See additional assessment of Conan Daily blog at WP:WikiProject Beauty Pageants/Sources. Also Robert McClenon is correct, WP is not a suicide pact regarding our ability to delete crud. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:45, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.