Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithunn Dev
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nakon 02:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Mithunn Dev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability and sources Fitindia (talk) 19:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as I myself reviewed and tagged this with PROD but it was removed, there's nothing at all convincing of notability here. SwisterTwister talk 04:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete with one film listed its WP:Too soon, plenty of time for an article in the future , after more film or tv roles Atlantic306 (talk) 17:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.